Easy Mac Blu-ray Solution?
#1
Posted 11 October 2009 - 04:03 PM
I am a mac user. I want to buy a blu-ray disc and have a 1080p rip from that disc in plex. What is the simplest and cheapest way for me to do this?
I apologize but I do not know anything about blu-ray drives. It was sounding like there were going to be new imacs with blu-ray support but now it sounds like that is not a reality.
So is there currently an easy cheap solution?
Thanks guys!
Dave
#2
Posted 11 October 2009 - 04:09 PM
well, that's not quite true.... the easy and cheap way to do it is to forget about the optical media and just download a bluray rip from torrents...
#3
Posted 11 October 2009 - 04:52 PM
Basically, if the disc is not BD+ you can download MakeMKV beta and hope that it works. You will also need an external Blu-ray drive in a USB2 or FW enclosure. The drive can be a BD-ROM, but it must be able to write to something, even if it's just a CD. This is because of something weird about OS X that I've never been able to find details about. At any rate, once you have it mounted and MakeMKV sees it, all you do is rip and MakeMKV removes encryption, HDCP and rewraps the Blu-ray m2ts into an MKV container with either DTS or AC3 5.1 audio. I've not used MakeMKV in some time, but my recollection is that you have to navigate to the correct file, which is usually the largest in the BMDV/STREAM folder. The only exception are those videos that are split into multiple files (Disney does this a lot), in which case you have to get them assembled from the playlist file, which is located in BMDV/PLAYLIST. AnyDVD HD reads these, but I'm not sure if MakeMKV does. Once ripped, Plex will open them.
Plex Advanced Guide for Blu-ray
My PlexBox, an Asus P5N7A-VM Hackintosh
#6
Posted 12 October 2009 - 03:56 AM
#7
Posted 12 October 2009 - 02:27 PM
Blu-ray drive that can write to dvd's or cd's (not necessarily blu-rays). It is just important that the drive can read blu-rays and write to something. Something like this one.
MakeMKV -
Handbrake - This is if you want to encode your source material to lower the size of the video (reduce a 25GB to 8GB or whatever). Use the latest SVN snapshot for the best blu-ray support.
Specifically, the process goes:
Put your blu-ray disc into your drive and open up MakeMKV. Read the disc with MakeMKV and select the tracks you want to rip (leaving out unnecessary audio and subtitle tracks). You can pretty much tell which video tracks to rip based on their size. MakeMKV will output a single mkv file for each video track you ripped.
Now comes the encoding process, if you so choose to do so. As talked about above, VC1 will be encoded into x264 here so you don't need to worry about that if you encode your videos. This will be the longest part of the process, especially if your machine is not very beefy. Open up Handbrake and select the ripped mkv file as your source. My recommendation for your Handbrake settings are the following:
Format: MKV
Video Codec: x264
FPS: Same as source
Constant Quality: 22 (56.86%) - You can adjust this (higher percentage leads to larger file sizes)
Advanced Options: ref=3:mixed-refs=1:bframes=3:weightb=1:b-pyramid=1:b-adapt=2:me=umh:subq=9:analyse=all:8x8dct=1:no-fast-pskip=1
Make sure your picture size has a width of 1920 pixels and keeps its aspect ratio (if the picture is wider, handbrake won't encode black bars into the picture so the size will be like 1920 x 780 or something). Many blu-rays are 1920 x 1080 though.
As far as audio goes, you could choose to extract the audio from the original mkv that MakeMKV creates and mux it back into the mkv after it has been encoded. That way Handbrake never touches the audio. I trust the original audio file more than I trust the passthru settings in Handbrake. Use tsMuxer to demux the audio track from the original mkv and use MkvMerge to mux it back in at the end.
I hope that helps.
#8
Posted 12 October 2009 - 02:54 PM
So the only hardware I need is a combo blu-ray drive?
I am currently using makeMKV for my regular rips. I'm assuming this is the only mac native software choice?
If I don't want to encode the mkv rip are you saying the file will be roughly 25 gigs?
Will I lose any quality encoding it down to a smaller file?
So makeMKV can not rip dvd+ blu-ray discs?
Thanks again,
Dave
#9
Posted 12 October 2009 - 03:25 PM
fishbisquit, on 12 October 2009 - 02:54 PM, said:
So the only hardware I need is a combo blu-ray drive?
I am currently using makeMKV for my regular rips. I'm assuming this is the only mac native software choice?
If I don't want to encode the mkv rip are you saying the file will be roughly 25 gigs?
Will I lose any quality encoding it down to a smaller file?
So makeMKV can not rip dvd+ blu-ray discs?
Thanks again,
Dave
Yeah the only hardware you need is the drive, which can cost anywhere from $99+ depending on if you only get a BD-ROM drive or not.
MakeMKV is the only Mac option so far (but it is a very nice option imo). You would need to go through boot camp to rip using the Windows options.
File sizes for blu-rays greatly vary but the average is probably 20-30 gigs.
It all depends on your settings, but with the right settings, your encoded video will be transparent (as in there is no difference in quality, between it and the original). Anything above 55% constant quality is considered sufficient for a transparent encode for blu-rays (it's more like 62% for dvds). Also, I have found that the no fast p-skip flag in the advanced settings helps to reduce artifacts in gradual gradients and dark scenes (dark scenes are the biggest problems for x264).
Using the above settings, I really don't think you can tell any difference, even upon close examination. But you can try it out for yourself.
MakeMKV currently cannot decode BD+ blu-rays. The MakeMKV developer is tight lipped on a date for BD+ support, but I would say to expect it by 2010.
#10
Posted 12 October 2009 - 08:04 PM
ericmatthys, on 12 October 2009 - 03:25 PM, said:
MakeMKV is the only Mac option so far (but it is a very nice option imo). You would need to go through boot camp to rip using the Windows options.
File sizes for blu-rays greatly vary but the average is probably 20-30 gigs.
It all depends on your settings, but with the right settings, your encoded video will be transparent (as in there is no difference in quality, between it and the original). Anything above 55% constant quality is considered sufficient for a transparent encode for blu-rays (it's more like 62% for dvds). Also, I have found that the no fast p-skip flag in the advanced settings helps to reduce artifacts in gradual gradients and dark scenes (dark scenes are the biggest problems for x264).
Using the above settings, I really don't think you can tell any difference, even upon close examination. But you can try it out for yourself.
MakeMKV currently cannot decode BD+ blu-rays. The MakeMKV developer is tight lipped on a date for BD+ support, but I would say to expect it by 2010.
Is there a way to tell which discs are BD+ blu-ray discs?
#11
Posted 12 October 2009 - 09:33 PM
fishbisquit, on 12 October 2009 - 08:04 PM, said:
It looks like there has been update to MakeMKV that I didn't read about.
Check it out here: http://www.makemkv.c...c.php?f=1&t=612
If your BD+ disc fails, it creates a dump that you send to the MakeMKV developer, and he will include it into the SVQ file used to decode the BD+ disc. He has said that he updates the SVQ file daily so it shouldn't be a long wait once you send in the dump. Before long, hopefully, many of the BD+ discs will be included in this SVQ file, however this solution appears to be only temporary based on a forum post in the doom9 forums: "...the current absence of a generic SVQ is a temporary thing. Generic SVQ will be released sooner or later and this nuisance will go away."
#12
Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:52 PM
http://store.fastmac...products_id=406
Thanks,
#13
Posted 15 October 2009 - 03:43 AM
fishbisquit, on 14 October 2009 - 09:52 PM, said:
http://store.fastmac...products_id=406
Thanks,
It should be fine.
#14
Posted 22 October 2009 - 09:00 AM
But something about the site & app designs tells me it's flaky...
#15
Posted 22 October 2009 - 10:03 PM
Is blu-ray resolution worth all this trouble?
I know it's not too much trouble but I'm still wondering if I'll notice enough of a difference to make the investment worth it?
I've read in a few other forums people claiming that most blu-rays are not that much better then unconverted dvds.
I use the up converting feature within PLEX. So do you think I will notice much of a difference with PLEX out putting to a 53" plasma?
Thanks,
Dave
#16
Posted 22 October 2009 - 10:37 PM
#17
Posted 23 October 2009 - 01:03 AM
Billy Joe, on 22 October 2009 - 10:37 PM, said:
Blu-ray is pretty jaw-dropping compared to even an upscaled dvd. The lines are crisp and the detail is amazing. Definitely worth the trouble in my opinion.
#18
Posted 23 October 2009 - 05:13 AM
fishbisquit, on 22 October 2009 - 10:03 PM, said:
I've read in a few other forums people claiming that most blu-rays are not that much better then unconverted dvds.
I use the up converting feature within PLEX. So do you think I will notice much of a difference with PLEX out putting to a 53" plasma?
Thanks,
Dave
The difference is huge.
Whether or not you notice it is another issue. The biggest factor is viewing distance. If that 53" is 20 feet away, probably won't notice the difference. I believe the ideal viewing distance for a 53" is 6-8 feet for 1080 content.
#19
Posted 23 October 2009 - 11:12 AM
However so far it seems that while open-source DVD playback fully supports menus, subtitles, extras, etc., there are no equivalent full feature BD players for Linux and Mac and the only ones for Windows are commercial. I would have thought the biggest difficulty was the ripping rather than working out how to play them as I believe much of the information on the structure is 'out there' and of course the actual video/audio already plays. So what's the hold up preventing a 'proper' player? (Lets ignore the Dolby HD issue for the moment.)

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote